Research Programme

Integrated Research Programme

My overarching research interests concern how learning is understood, how educational quality is judged, and how trustworthy knowledge is produced, with a particular emphasis on technology and engineering education.

These interests come together in an integrated research programme organised around three intersecting pillars.

I also engage with broader but cognate areas of scholarship, often through collaboration, where adjacent questions and methods help extend the scope of this work.

Research Pillars

Learning and Spatial Ability

Focuses on the role of spatial ability in learning, development, and performance in technology and engineering education.

Current Interests
  • Spatial abilty development through intervention
  • Understanding the structure and interrelationships of spatial factors
  • Associations between spatial ability and learning

Educational Assessment and Comparative Judgement

Focuses on the use of adaptive comparative judgement for the assessment of complex competencies, typically design.

Current Interests
  • The development of ACJ systems
  • The valid assessment of design activity
  • Non-educational measurement applications of ACJ

Research Credibility and Meta-research

Focuses on the improvement of research practices in technology and engineering education.

Current Interests
  • Improving replicability in technology and engineering education research
  • Examining research robustness, reproducibility, and transparency
  • Conducting evidence synthesis and meta-scientific critique

Research Intersections

While the pillars above represent distinct domains, my work actively engages them in an interdisciplinary way.

Spatial ability × Assessment

Can spatial ability be recognised and evaluated in authentic assessment contexts?

Spatial ability × Meta-research

How can we improve validity in spatial ability measurement?

Comparative Judgement × Meta-research

How can we systematically evaluate and validate the theoretical claims underpinning comparative judgement?